| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
VA_Rapier

Joined: Aug 08, 2008 Posts: 1083
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
_79_niah

Joined: Jun 24, 2008 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
amazing thing is that this monster actually moved and was used (well tested afaik) - cold war has produced some weird contraptions on both sides _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pucara-ARG

Joined: Apr 23, 2008 Posts: 130 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wow thats sure looks loke a spaceship..
insane---- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sugar Head Admin


Joined: Oct 20, 2005 Posts: 4288 Location: McMinnville, OR
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I saw a program on this thing years ago. Found a little on Wiki.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle
It could carry a lot of weight.
I always thought this was a cool idea. _________________ Never argue with an idiot, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TomcatViP

Joined: Nov 08, 2006 Posts: 748
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Browse W.I.G (Wing In Ground effect or for a more detailed explanation there (a very good site):
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/aerodynamics/q0130.shtml
Bartini in Russia was the father of that strange design. Reading some of the related archive will lead you trough more hair rising account of what human thinking can achieve.
~S! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Viper2000

Joined: Oct 10, 2005 Posts: 2065
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
400 tonnes flying at 500 km/h <10 m above the sea is scary enough without the missiles...
The fact that google lets me read it all so easily is possibly even scarier though! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VA_Rapier

Joined: Aug 08, 2008 Posts: 1083
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TomcatViP wrote: |
Bartini in Russia was the father of that strange design. Reading some of the related archive will lead you trough more hair rising account of what human thinking can achieve.
~S! |
Human thinking and evidently near-unlimited funding  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
terrorfleiger

Joined: Oct 15, 2008 Posts: 268
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know a guy who has one. For the record, he tells me it will easily out-turn a Spit.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JZG_Thiem Server Admin


Joined: Jan 06, 2007 Posts: 762 Location: Frankfurt/Germany
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| terrorfleiger wrote: |
I know a guy who has one. For the record, he tells me it will easily out-turn a Spit.  |
..on the deck of course! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulkin

Joined: Mar 12, 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Moscow, Russia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
splendours and miseries of russian aviation _________________ =YeS=Bulkin
....learning English.... skype me bulkinpv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pucara-ARG

Joined: Apr 23, 2008 Posts: 130 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| such short wings?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sugar Head Admin


Joined: Oct 20, 2005 Posts: 4288 Location: McMinnville, OR
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It only gets about 10 feet off the water Pucara. _________________ Never argue with an idiot, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Viper2000

Joined: Oct 10, 2005 Posts: 2065
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ground effect reduces induced drag because the ground modifies the formation of tip vorticies.
Therefore high L/Ds can be attained by pretty low aspect ratio wings. The article claims 25:1 for the vehicle in the pictures. Which is pretty impressive given that the fuselage appears to have the aerodynamics of an SUV...
The other interesting thing about these machines is that the centre of pressure moves aft in ground effect, much as it does in supersonic flight. Which means that if the vehicle is conventionally stable in ground effect, it's likely to have marginal or even negative stability out of ground effect.
Which is pretty much what is described in an account of somebody deciding to take one up to 500 m or so "to find out what would happen". Whether this decision was vodka-assisted is not recorded...
BTW, did you guys know there are several other parts to that blog post? In part 2 you can see the cockpit instrumentation and internal structure. The description of the vehicle as "an aeroplane built in a shipyard" is pretty accurate. The cockpit instrumentation is interesting because it's not quite the same as a conventional aircraft.
It seems to have been designed to operate at up to 10º alpha, with a g limit of 2.5ish. Since 2 g is 60º of bank, this implies flight at almost 1 span mean altitude.
As the tip of the outside wing would be at almost 1.5 spans altitude, it would have much weaker ground effect than the inside tip at say 0.1 spans, and so I imagine that the stability & control implications would have been quite interesting... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FooFighter

Joined: Oct 13, 2005 Posts: 101
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MT7ewylPlAQ&feature=related
3min-> theres footage of the plane from first post. _________________
"Hello? Yes, yes, I'd like to leave a message for the head of the Flying Corps, please. That's Air chief marshall Sir Hugh Massingbird-Massingbird, VC, DFC and Bar. Message reads "Where are you, you bastard."
Cpt. Blackadder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fender

Joined: Mar 02, 2010 Posts: 3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|